Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:13:53 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mlx driver related kernel panic in Freebsd 5.2.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <20040301141145.I12830@pooker.samsco.home> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403011305550.62088-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403011305550.62088-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > isn't crashing the system a security problem :-) It's the same policy that we have on RELENG_5_1, RELENG_5_0, RELENG_4_9, RELENG_4_8, RELENG_4_7, etc. Scott > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Scott Long wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Jonathan Weiss wrote: > > > > > > > > Great to hear, thanks a lot for testing it. It looks like the problem can > > > > manifest itself when a whole lot of I/O comes into the driver at once. An > > > > easy way that I've found to generate a pattern like this is to turn > > > > softupdates off, then start 5-10 concurrent copies of large trees with > > > > lots of files. Then when the pagedaemon does its 30-second interval run, > > > > it'll likely send 500-1000 i/o requests at once to the card. > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > > > > Can you please backport the patch to 5.2.1? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jonathan > > > > Unfortunately, no. The RELENG_5_2 branch is closed to all but security > > fixes from now on. Had I known about this problem before 5.2.1 was > > released then I would have made sure that it was fixed before the release. > > > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040301141145.I12830>