Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Nov 2003 07:20:10 +0000
From:      Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To:        "Oldach, Helge" <Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPSec VPN & NATD (problem with alias_address vs redirect_addr ess)
Message-ID:  <20031115072010.GA72782@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CA16@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com>
References:  <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CA16@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:54:40AM +0100, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> I do well understand that there is no general solution. However, FreeBSD
> is definitely behind what is available on the commercial market today. Call
> it "cheating" - but it's out there and it works. I would rather prefer to
> see
> a feature that doesn't solve a 100% case than to see nothing because we feel
> that a "general specification" is missing.

I'm in agreement here. The fact alone that hundreds of DSL providers are
blocking tunneling and VPN protocols should be enough. So far, though,
our provider passes ESP, so I'm not in a hurry to implement this myself.

BMS


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031115072010.GA72782>