From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 04:45:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9DF16A41A for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidb@boothscientific.com) Received: from mx1.lsn.net (mx1.lsn.net [66.90.130.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A8913C480 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidb@boothscientific.com) Received: from [172.18.0.26] (24-155-246-45.dyn.grandenetworks.net [24.155.246.45]) by mx1.lsn.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l9Q4jZOM022369 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:45:35 -0500 From: David Booth To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:45:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> In-Reply-To: <200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710252345.19900.davidb@boothscientific.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4596/Thu Oct 25 18:37:29 2007 on mx0.lsn.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 Available... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidb@boothscientific.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:45:46 -0000 On Thursday 25 October 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote: > > > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got > > > sets of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and > > > procedures in place to try and minimize the mistakes I could > > > make while doing those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD, > > > one set for RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for > > > the 7.0-RELEASE build are the ones that had previously been > > > doing the HEAD snapshots and I missed doing one very important > > > adjustment to the build routine while doing the BETA1 builds, > > > which resulted in the builds being based on HEAD. I didn't > > > notice during the tests I do before uploading it because the > > > build procedure makes most things (e.g. uname) say what you > > > told it to build, you need to look harder to discover that sort > > > of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should have been called > > > something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-( > > > > > > Sorry for the screw-up. > > > > This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it > > cannot parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of > > handling the 1.5 after the BETA. > > I hadn't tried that... When you do build a new kernel, it > goes back to BETA1 though. > > Tuc Or you can take care of it by setenvr until then.