From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 12 22:21:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3492837C20F for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:21:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA56941; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:21:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA21190; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:21:20 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007130521.XAA21190@harmony.village.org> To: Chris Stenton Subject: Re: loader config and the new buildkernel Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:08:29 BST." <200007120908.KAA01654@hawk.gnome.co.uk> References: <200007120908.KAA01654@hawk.gnome.co.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:21:20 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200007120908.KAA01654@hawk.gnome.co.uk> Chris Stenton writes: : Ok I've moved over to the new regime and used : but it boots the right kernel. Should I be editing any other options? Should be OK. For a long time now the kernel name was obtained by a sysctl. I've had good luck running kernels with non-standard names, but it can be a PITA sometimes, especially around major release upgrades. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message