Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:13:08 -0600
From:      Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>
To:        Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ?
Message-ID:  <54BBE9A4.80300@my.hennepintech.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAE63ME474RefGOK=30sja4XPF3JOVAbdK64YaOai3ZmnoP+Jtw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAE63ME7Qv-99-3OvCnj3gm4-4rHrO2cGjVvQOPBvuO-JNSi5Yg@mail.gmail.com>	<54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> <CAE63ME474RefGOK=30sja4XPF3JOVAbdK64YaOai3ZmnoP+Jtw@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 2015.01.18 10:05, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> 
> On 17 January 2015 at 16:52, Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu
> <mailto:aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2015.01.17 09 <tel:2015.01.17%2009>:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>     > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of BASE ?
>     >
>     > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has.
>     >
>     > I for one, would very much like it.
>     What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)?
> 
> 
> Andrew, Emmanuel,
> 
> 
> I wouldn't know, first time I hear of the binary.
> 
> It may be failure on my part but I do not remember having read about it in any
> of the handbook's pages either.
>  
It is new for 10.0. I thought the handbook had been updated, but apparently
not. There is an outstanding PR, however:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194080



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54BBE9A4.80300>