Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:24:12 +0200 From: Hannes Mehnert <hannes@mehnert.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPSec + 5.2.current Problem Message-ID: <20040816212412.GA1143@mehnert.org> In-Reply-To: <20040810103127.56fda573@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <20040808132524.GB1033@mehnert.org> <20040808155623.2fa6fb4b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040809112700.GB659@mehnert.org> <20040809150754.13ca108a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091314260.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091338520.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040809161137.0bab2d07@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091417500.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040810103127.56fda573@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:31:27AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:49 +0000 (UTC) > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > > > which on ? use vs. require ? I think this is just not HEAD. > > > > > > In my case it's -current from Jul 18. > > > > and use vs. require does make a difference for you ? > > I don't know, I can't test it, the box is in production now. But it > seems to make a difference for Hannes. It made a difference some months ago. I've switched to FAST_IPSEC. Don't know if require and IPSEC is still broken. Best Regards, Hannes Mehnert -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBISX5RcuNlziBjRwRAvwnAJ4k/kWQh1yZKpvF8cWIQC9cs5+gwgCglzCf fwXB6hQGP6a2gESaG4p0t8E= =Jj4i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040816212412.GA1143>