From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 16 21:24:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DCA16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:24:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from beagle2.mehnert.org (beagle2.mehnert.org [212.42.235.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B144143D2D
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:24:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hannes@mehnert.org)
Received: from localhost (unknown [217.213.129.209])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Hannes Mehnert", Issuer "mehnert root CA" (verified OK))
	by beagle2.mehnert.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A215F9585D; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:24:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:24:12 +0200
From: Hannes Mehnert <hannes@mehnert.org>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Message-ID: <20040816212412.GA1143@mehnert.org>
References: <20040808132524.GB1033@mehnert.org>
	<20040808155623.2fa6fb4b@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<20040809112700.GB659@mehnert.org>
	<20040809150754.13ca108a@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091314260.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
	<20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091338520.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
	<20040809161137.0bab2d07@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091417500.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
	<20040810103127.56fda573@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040810103127.56fda573@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPSec + 5.2.current Problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:24:51 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:31:27AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:27:49 +0000 (UTC)
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > 
> > > > which on ? use vs. require ? I think this is just not HEAD.
> > >
> > > In my case it's -current from Jul 18.
> > 
> > and use vs. require does make a difference for you ?
> 
> I don't know, I can't test it, the box is in production now. But it
> seems to make a difference for Hannes.

It made a difference some months ago. I've switched to FAST_IPSEC.
Don't know if require and IPSEC is still broken.

Best Regards,

Hannes Mehnert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBISX5RcuNlziBjRwRAvwnAJ4k/kWQh1yZKpvF8cWIQC9cs5+gwgCglzCf
fwXB6hQGP6a2gESaG4p0t8E=
=Jj4i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----