From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 4 3:57: 9 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD6337B401; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [193.124.215.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4AE43E4A; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:57:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from drweb by mail.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18g1gv-0001wQ-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:56:41 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mail.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18g1gu-0001wD-00; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:56:40 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h14BulTb097603; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:56:47 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h14BukfW097508; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:56:46 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:56:46 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: Alan Eldridge , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, anholt@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/kdebase3 Makefile Message-ID: <20030204115646.GA95958@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200302031235.h13CZwGB073669@repoman.freebsd.org> <200302031408.14342.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302031408.14342.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Envelope-To: mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com, alane@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, anholt@freebsd.org Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:08:14PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Qt-3.1 can be configured with ``-xft'' and with very minor patching will > build against Xft2. Do we want such a thing? I have it built that way, > and the characters seem to look better on my screen. I think this would do nicely for all KDE/Qt users out there. > > Will our next XFree86-4-libraries provide Xft2 instead of Xft? Xft2 would not hit any of future XFree86 releases until 4.3.0. Moreover, I see no point in hacking in Xft2 support into XFree86-4-libs since Xft2/fontconfig live perfectly fine in the ports tree on their own. ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message