From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep 27 12:10:23 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA10522
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 12:10:23 -0700
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (sri.MT.net [204.94.231.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA10508
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 12:10:20 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA17993; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:12:29 -0600
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:12:29 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199509271912.NAA17993@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /etc/services, supfilesrv, but no sup entry.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.950927114033.12850F-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
References: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.950927114033.12850F-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Can an entry for sup be added to the /etc/services by default?  There's 
> an entry for supfileserv, might as well add the other I would think.

Umm, supfileserv *is* the entry for sup.  What other entry should there
be besides it?  The only other entry is for supfiledbg, which is the
non-standard port used for testing purposes.


Nate