Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:25:45 +0400
From:      =?koi8-r?B?98HEyc0g8MXU0tHF1w==?= <vpetryaev@tdnika.ru>
To:        "'Jeremy Messenger'" <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, mezz@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1
Message-ID:  <000001cb740d$769c6930$63d53b90$@ru>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinyQEFofRKD549fdU7MiPLU7heTpfkpn+wcRxhk@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <000501cb70fe$e89a6df0$b9cf49d0$@ru> <AANLkTinyQEFofRKD549fdU7MiPLU7heTpfkpn+wcRxhk@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Hello!

I'm fully understand, that every version of Transmission (as every =
software)
has bugs.
But, different bugs annoying different users.
For example:
- 2.04 try to connect via IPv6 when IPv6 completely disabled, but 2.11 =
not
- Ticket #3329 (Connection problems when downloading) fixed
- Small file cache reduce HDD load (20-30% in my configuration!)

And result: Transmission 2.11 runs on my server 5 days without any =
issues.

May be better let user to choose not last release versions, but always =
allow
user to use last version?
For example, if you want, it's possible to create two (stable and
development) branches in ports tree.

Best regards, Vadim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Messenger [mailto:mezz.freebsd@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 5:15 AM
To: =F7=C1=C4=C9=CD =F0=C5=D4=D2=D1=C5=D7
Cc: mezz@freebsd.org; ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.04_1

2010/10/21 =F7=C1=C4=C9=CD =F0=C5=D4=D2=D1=C5=D7 <vpetryaev@tdnika.ru>:
> Hello!
>
>
>
> Transmission was two times released after version 2.04
> https://trac.transmissionbt.com/roadmap?show=3Dcompleted
>
> 10 October released 2.10 and 17 October released 2.11
>
> May be you need some help for port maintenance?
>
> As I understand, this port require only one patch changes - because
patched
> libtransmission/fdlimit.c changed.

I am not commit the update yet. Transmission have a bad history of
release version that isn't stable enough as you can see they already
have 2.11 in a very short peroid. I am able to reproduce a few of
problems in 2.10 and 2.11. The 2.12 might be released sometimes soon
(just a guess), so I will see how it goes.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Good luck, Vadim


--=20
mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001cb740d$769c6930$63d53b90$>