Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:42:25 -0600
From:      Programmer in Training <pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: concerning flash under freebsd
Message-ID:  <20100617074225.8pcs9r9ou8gk04o8@mail.joseph-a-nagy-jr.us>
In-Reply-To: <4C1A045F.6020103@onetel.com>
References:  <AANLkTikVilkrvnNMTQ_wvB8AzX31_sUvpcykcv07E3Wf@mail.gmail.com> <20100615211740.GA50967@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20100615154956.cfz6ip454w8gcco4@mail.joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <20100617081156.8441dc67.freebsd@edvax.de> <20100617035140.x8bpf02348g4o8ok@mail.joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <4C1A045F.6020103@onetel.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com>:

> Programmer in Training wrote:
>> Quoting Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>:
>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:49:56 -0600, Programmer in Training   =20
>>> <pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> wrote:
<snip>
>> That's a no-go, I have it on good authority that h.264 was chosen  =20
>> over Theora. That along with mpeg-la having put out a press release =20
>>  saying it won't charge royalties for "free" uses of some of it's  =20
>> patents several months ago[0], while I would love for Theora to  =20
>> have won out as the standard, once again corporate interest (this  =20
>> time a big push from Apple, from what I understand) has won out.
>
> And Mozilla won't use H264. Also add into the mix that Google has just
> bought VP8 and open sourced it. Mozilla supports VP8 but Apple is
> already dissing it:
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/may/20/apple-steve-jobs-vp8=
-patent
>
> So I think we have a very long way to go before we can stop using flash
> for web based video.

Entirely my point.

> (According to wikipedia Theora is a fork of VP3 which the developer On2
> released some time ago. VP6 made into macromedia flash codec. So On2's
> codecs have a long history of video on the web.)

That would seem to be supported by the Theora website[0].

>> won't support it. But that's all irregardless to the OPs question  =20
>> of bugginess on FreeBSD. If the Linux emulation isn't enough and  =20
>> there is no option but to switch to an entirely different platform, =20
>>  why even provide such an option? Linux emulation takes up a lot of =20
>>  resources (space wise on the drive).
>
> Flash video works absolutely fine here and there is a lot of great
> content and interesting and entertaining material out there. I'm really
> grateful to the FreeBSD developers for getting it working so well :)
>
> FreeBSD muji2.config 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Mar
> 24 11:51:43 GMT 2010     root@muji2.config:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>  i386
> firefox-3.5.8,1
> linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r42
> flashblock 1.5.13  # This may be a critical feature of a successful
> flash intallation.

Aside from npviewer not killing itself on exit and some sync issues, =20
I've not had any problems, either. The need for Linux emulation, =20
though, still stinks (mostly from a disk space pov).

[0]: http://www.theora.org/faq/#VP3
--=20
Yours in Christ,

PIT
All original content (C) under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Please do not CC me. If I'm posting to a list it is because I am subscribed.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100617074225.8pcs9r9ou8gk04o8>