From owner-freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Wed Mar 1 00:06:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chromium@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCF5CF10AF for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F172FC9; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31268199D; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <1488326773.71297.3.camel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: chromium port improvements From: "Carlos J. Puga Medina" To: Lars Engels Cc: freebsd-chromium Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:06:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170228204445.GO34495@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1488286982.2339.15.camel@FreeBSD.org> <20170228204445.GO34495@e-new.0x20.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DZGplpgTGNW/NIGVe75H" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:06:22 -0000 --=-DZGplpgTGNW/NIGVe75H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 21:44 +0100, Lars Engels wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:03:02PM +0100, Carlos J. Puga Medina > wrote: > >=20 > > Hi everyone, > >=20 > > I've backported some patches from OpenBSD to improve appearence and > > font handling. > > In the meantime, I disabled WebRTC support because it does not work > > properly on BSD (needs more bits) and fewer modules are needed to > > build > > chromium. > >=20 > > FreeBSD is not an officially supported platform.=C2=A0Since WebRTC is > > following all the chromium developing procedure, so if chromium > > development is not supported on FreeBSD, then WebRTC won't > > neither.=C2=A0 > >=20 > > All opinions on this are welcome! > Do you have a package for 11 to test this? I don't have it, but here's the patch. https://people.freebsd.org/~cpm/patches/chromium.diff --=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-DZGplpgTGNW/NIGVe75H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEExg6Ul1MCeTvMLbuJofNdZubQVFMFAli2EHdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM2 MEU5NDk3NTMwMjc5M0JDQzJEQkI4OUExRjM1RDY2RTZEMDU0NTMACgkQofNdZubQ VFMTHgf+OlX/i8llFeHnxXWQOMeqwRDMjgS2f6CZS2Kl0GpM0Gf8u4wZQe4TKRTI /o43wWnI3/2RKE6AhUyTkYZAsIt+dMhiH2tsj+8J1FEdQZd8tuKjbJ3yK3EtEf0/ qdcHlf3O0Jo/x6grshK6wxNGe+IwIC2DFTn2ZEOweRe8jrCtVc3qwi6YNf8gYATb MqwI5t688TInS5KOz7fl4ZCzyfqvaD2VOMXCzcZJ1MKP3kX8IPk7r2a0NRu8B18z diD8QoZAc5S4dxwQhpC+sCSdq11LDpTb9Jy2lSFpPucVt5QJ+1wU8eK9okaN0oJu XplKa+KlM0FHzNHPQjZHuLmDCxHONw== =6oju -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DZGplpgTGNW/NIGVe75H--