Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 00:52:53 +0200 From: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= <se@FreeBSD.org> To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: Softupdates a mount option? Message-ID: <20040526225253.GA83107@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <01df01c44368$71c9d910$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <40B4ECC8.50808@fer.hr> <01df01c44368$71c9d910$7890a8c0@dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-05-26 23:28 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> wrote: > "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@fer.hr> wrote: > > This has been really nagging me for a long time: Why aren't softupdates made > > a mount option (like 'sync' and 'async')? Do I remember correctly that it is > > done so in NetBSD (where it's called softdeps), so it's doable? > > > take a look at this thread : > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=920087+0+archive/2000/freebsd-current/20000625.freebsd-current This was not the end of the discussion! See the following message from Kirk, posted a week later: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=404219+0+archive/2000/freebsd-arch/20000702.freebsd-arch Regards, STefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040526225253.GA83107>