From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jun 15 9: 2:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56CC37B8EA for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:02:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@trang.nuxi.com [209.152.133.57]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA52056 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:02:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA32728 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:02:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:02:42 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: problem building modules for release. Message-ID: <20000615090242.A32679@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As some may know, modules are not winding up in the `bin' distribution in release builds right now. The problem is one may decided they don't want to build modules when they build their kernel, but they cannot decide to do the traditional way of building modules with the world. I am putting back that ability. Now that we've had a taste of both ways, I have two questions of people: 1. Should the symbol be MODULES_WITH_KERNEL or MODULES_WITH_WORLD, (or something else)? 2. Which should be the default? Building modules with world or kernel. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message