From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 4 21:04:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB706106564A for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 21:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C99B8FC0C for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 21:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQPfp-0004Zs-48; Fri, 04 May 2012 22:04:21 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SQPfo-0002A2-UC; Fri, 04 May 2012 22:04:20 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q44L4KBi030665; Fri, 4 May 2012 22:04:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q44L4Kge030664; Fri, 4 May 2012 22:04:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 22:04:20 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Outback Dingo Message-ID: <20120504210420.GA30610@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Outback Dingo , Erik N?rgaard , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FA41738.4040901@kleppnett.no> <4FA43484.6020909@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Off topic: NetBSD or OpenBSD for Alpha server ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 21:04:22 -0000 On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:45:17PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Erik N?rgaard wrote: > > On 04/05/2012 19:51, Kenneth Hatteland wrote: > > > >> So I checked the 2 other main contenders and just wanted to ask if > >> anyone here had an opinion what 2 install of the BSDs ? Or perhaps > >> FreeBSD 6.4 is a good choice ( I have not tested Open or Net BSD so > >> FreeBSD is my hometurf) The machine will probably be a server to have > >> fun with and hopefully learn something from. Perhaps some server role in > >> my rig, routing, security etc..... > >> > >> Any advise would be nice :) > > QNX will not run on the Alpha architecture, freeBSD 6.4 in my opinion > is still the far better choice for anything alpha > the only other thing i would recommend oin that platorm would be > OpenVMS from the hobbyist kit. But then again > I only run real Operating systems on my Alphas :) 6.4 is way past EOL. It's irresponsible to recommend it. I've run VMS on Alphas for several years, there's nothing wrong with it. Indeed, it's very good. Plus VMS Alpha is highly optimised. You are unlikely to get a similar performance from any other OS on this architecture. If you want to learn UNIX, then I strongly recommend FreeBSD, but do not use an obsolete version. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423