From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 14 17:53:43 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05C0184;
 Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from artemrts@ukr.net)
Received: from ffe10.ukr.net (ffe10.ukr.net [195.214.192.60])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A63AC0;
 Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:53:42 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
 s=ffe; 
 h=Date:Message-Id:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
 bh=etrq1yVHCoBkAEn3prd7kSDf+mQ6qMXLk8XtLM480Dw=; 
 b=MVwLCqEeGyhChkDjRopy0PLNHqvTZeT+3VCAfBpciS3RM3Xi6J5JVnFpHuvh4oqoT38z4xaKN2ux3R9KK4epj532o5fAJRjDu7HGNVqnX7sS31wVqTU589gEYGwZo+/MQ2aWQ+pEp71kJIMctnEd9VelhxyGQ9dzoTXvoCB34Ik=;
Received: from mail by ffe10.ukr.net with local ID 1URQkw-000DrL-J1
 ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:30:22 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Subject: Re[2]: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer
In-Reply-To: <20130414160648.GD96431@in-addr.com>
References: <20130411201805.GD76816@FreeBSD.org>
 <7D8ACD5C-821D-4505-82E4-02267A7BA4F8@FreeBSD.org>
 <E2F803DD-1F3A-430E-957F-7AB1904CDF42@samsco.org>
 <96D56EAE-E797-429E-AEC9-42B19B048CCC@FreeBSD.org>
 <6DEDD3EA-45C1-4549-AA13-5E4F6674BE3E@samsco.org>
 <2D0B66DB-E232-4F34-9D01-57DF226B9BAA@FreeBSD.org>
 <2DA4A561-3304-432D-B5D1-7053A27E758F@yahoo.com>
 <F45FFB8A-4B54-4AEF-AA19-D96DAD0C399D@felyko.com>
 <CADLo839TyKF2dnONpQ6fyUAVOHG1dYYXih5wS3jANVZBiR=VTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304140946440.10505@wonkity.com>
 <20130414160648.GD96431@in-addr.com>
To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
From: "wishmaster" <artemrts@ukr.net>
X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net 4.0
Message-Id: <36562.1365960622.5652758659450863616@ffe10.ukr.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 20:30:22 +0300
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 18:12:54 +0000
Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>,
 "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:53:43 -0000



 --- Original message ---
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
Date: 14 April 2013, 19:06:59

 
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 09:48:33AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> > Is it possible to move ipfilter into a port?
> 
> That may work short term, but the ENOMAINTAINER problem will quickly creep
> up again as kernel APIs change.  If the author has lost interest in
> maintaining the FreeBSD port of ipfilter then unless someone steps forward
> to carry on the work, I don't see much of a future for ipfilter in
> FreeBSD
> 
> Do we honestly need three packet filters?
  
    Yes! This is the most clever thought in this thread. Why we need 3 firewalls? Two packet filters it's excess too.
     We have two packet filters: one with excellent syntax and functionality but with outdated bandwidth control mechanism (aka ALTQ); another - with nice traffic shaper/prioritization (dummynet)/classification (diffused) but with complicated implementation  in not trivial tasks.
    May be the next step will be discussion about one packet filter in the system?..

Cheers,