Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:33:33 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com>, freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS on Hardware RAID Message-ID: <9ea95f3d-6ccd-00d7-4234-b57a318f8bfe@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <7C7F0DBB-C751-433A-BCB7-4EBE71BB821D@gmail.com> References: <1180280695.63420.1547910313494.JavaMail.zimbra@gausus.net> <92646202.63422.1547910433715.JavaMail.zimbra@gausus.net> <CAOeNLurgn-ep1e=Lq9kgxXK%2By5xqq4ULnudKZAbye59Ys7q96Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1901200834470.12592@mail0.time-domain.co.uk> <1691666278.63816.1547976245836.JavaMail.zimbra@gausus.net> <CAOeNLuqQDJ3O1DgzdkshhiJVXd=6aPCMn86BOSwsJLZRdz21aw@mail.gmail.com> <7C7F0DBB-C751-433A-BCB7-4EBE71BB821D@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/01/2019 17:41, Ben RUBSON wrote: > ZFS does not really make sense with only one disk (what's the checksum > benefit once it has failed ?), you could go with any other FS... There is 'copies' property, though... -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ea95f3d-6ccd-00d7-4234-b57a318f8bfe>