From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Wed Sep 23 11:50:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B198A06E67 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D2F1F28 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: by oiev17 with SMTP id v17so21969337oie.1 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:50:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluelife.at; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cPq6YDZqH4856ktds44ARG1GnGo1qfomj3FzMz6VbXg=; b=eJE8u2I0Aapk7LkR5QNXh+58Ha6jYCg6Umw3H2Oj/cp5axUIFPpNPe6piwSHOAjKz4 38AkHuSQDJJbNs3cUT7ZRRrQ71LBpwwZK3Kzy3qgot0HeZpQ52Hu4Bu+Z4MlDmSlDlxS ocqY7bTD1ia/Rbt4L5ROJx97plDe/sd1rG2uI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cPq6YDZqH4856ktds44ARG1GnGo1qfomj3FzMz6VbXg=; b=VOLN5vPCwDk/1kCfoxDMiyIRKrbaREsPWKoOOWlS04iRwbyPxTVKpvZoENuRlaOdEd wDf8GX7y8c/E8bSXAV44zmMa69vG7K3tSPNNvINHA94+Y9hXcjgsQVOjfgfaYvxsugDe L3qmivbZWGslOrzf2edKB5Uob3wQGTxbYReFV5Dr4/U5/d5vgUeblfn1Vmfs8wEekV2H QoWRKv4XpVOHjmTcfRaO1MwZxpKtYA8IWdjRDvVGGw8j3SYG6vrFbsPQVsORy9aqJeNX gXquXejb/FbTzVC4uaUeGML76ltgKGhuf51LME9/qoUAr/UDEAFS4d4pxw1epPejrzv1 q9KA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2k0y78syemodbfKRr1Ot5zGjVOJQx17w5yM6XIdnGWTrlhUtrSe9VHpukMcBARrUyG0ps MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.91.2 with SMTP id p2mr5603656oib.41.1443009045826; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.173.168 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:50:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2001:470:701f:8100:e16f:d635:adec:698e] Received: by 10.76.173.168 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:50:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1442974232.1611559.391070321.7F761DD4@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <55FE9662.7000406@aon.at> <1442866256.1127084.389759513.29E96282@webmail.messagingengine.com> <56017026.6040809@aon.at> <5601AB71.9000003@aon.at> <5601C0B8.4000905@protected-networks.net> <1442974232.1611559.391070321.7F761DD4@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:50:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VirtualBox mangles memory From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= To: Mark Felder Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:50:47 -0000 Am 23.09.2015 4:10 vorm. schrieb "Mark Felder" : > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015, at 15:57, Michael Butler wrote: > > On 09/22/15 16:20, Adam Vande More wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Martin Birgmeier wrote: > > > > >> I am quite sure that the > > >> cause is to be found there > > >> > > > > > > I don't see any cause for surety in the info you have given us. Have you > > > tried any basic steps like monitoring usage during these events or running > > > it under truss/valgrind etc to find out what is going on? > > > > > > > Another data point .. > > > > I run it on -CURRENT and there have been a number of VM-related changes > > of late but I don't have any problems with it. > > > > However, you *must* recompile (at least) the modules whenever the kernel > > is rebuilt as they depend heavily on the underlying kernel structures, > > > > imb > > > > I agree. Just to be safe we really shouldn't provide packages for the > virtualbox kmods. It's just asking for trouble. No it's absolutely the right thing to provide them or as a package only user on a release you would be screwed. As a STABLE or CURRENT user you should never use any of them.