Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:40:17 -0800 From: Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rationale for moving *.port.mk to Mk? Message-ID: <19990129144017.B26710@wopr.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <199901292056.MAA32977@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>; from Steve Kargl on Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0800 References: <199901292056.MAA32977@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > This appears to be a gratuitous change? When you do a "make world", the /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk that is installed simply includes /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. The idea is that when you cvsup the Ports Collection, bsd.port.mk will be kept in-sync with the ports. Previously, unsynchronized bsd.port.mk and POrts Collections were a major support issue. -- Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> * Science rules. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/pgp.key for PGP public key 0x67203349. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990129144017.B26710>