From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Mar 28 19:16:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8395B5AB29C for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7ln53vsHz3Ft5 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1616958983; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YZyVDMMnb9W//DgiQ+sB1zUVyVVxeOu/BsvqcAhOkbI=; b=aELzIiFmloLKfKiPon0MAbwJj7JbqyasUUVUhxHTQ/s0zMWEMLZyNk8LtrNLRFoOQZcpqa vSkdMQx4Z9Ru+9s42yDE1f6s7T4BLlJ+QlcJwAko2fgwWeiOIJajUklRWu0t22icGW4EJi RRSo/nYK+kYYSX3yxnp68bXW6eh3mC0= Received: from amy (lfbn-idf2-1-644-4.w86-247.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.247.100.4]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 49d31ed7 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:16:23 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Andrew Mitchell Cc: Andrew Mitchell via freebsd-arm Subject: Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64? Message-Id: <20210328211623.be9560354fa3f10efd0de56d@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <21BE83BC-0667-44F7-83E4-1664A2BC6017@icloud.com> References: <21BE83BC-0667-44F7-83E4-1664A2BC6017@icloud.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F7ln53vsHz3Ft5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b=aELzIiFm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[icloud.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.83.155.74:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[manu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.83.155.74:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:26 -0000 Hi Andrew, On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:26:47 +0100 Andrew Mitchell via freebsd-arm wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've seen that there are arm machines for FreeBSD other than Raspberry. I've been using it with 14.0-CURRENT, and my skills are too limited for patching it. What patching did you needed ? > So, I've decided to find a machine on which a RELEASE or STABLE version > would work. > To my knowledge, and after many tries, it seems that there are no FreeBSD working smoothly on RPI4 B. > So, if you have any suggestions for a working FreeBSD on any machine, I'd be grateful. > I won't discard 14.0 CURRENT, as I've done quite a few things which were much fun. It's just for getting other experiences. > > Please, tell me. > Andy As other have asked, please say your use case. All the SoC that we support in FreeBSD have different market targets and also different support by FreeBSD. Cheers, -- Emmanuel Vadot