From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 10:02:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44D816A4CF for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:02:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail7.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5F243F93 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:02:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 26115 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2003 18:02:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 4 Nov 2003 18:02:55 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA4I2Wce070185; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:02:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20031104173702.S72398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:02:32 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: harti@freebsd.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 18:02:59 -0000 On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: > > HB>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > HB> > HB>JB> > HB>JB>On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> Hi, > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=10000. This > HB>JB>> worked until yesterday, but with the new interrupt code it doesn't boot > HB>JB>> anymore. It works for the standard HZ, but if I set HZ=1000 I get a double > HB>JB>> fault. I suspect a race condition in the interrupt handling. My config > HB>JB>> file has > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> options SMP > HB>JB>> device apic > HB>JB>> options HZ=1000 > HB>JB> > HB>JB>Ok, I can try to reproduce. > HB>JB> > HB>JB>> Device configuration finished. > HB>JB>> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1380009492 Hz quality -100 > HB>JB>> Timecounters cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > HB>JB>> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc048995d > HB>JB>> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc0821bf4 > HB>JB>> frame pointer cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> 0xc048995d is in critical_exit. It is the jmp after the popf from > HB>JB>> cpu_critical_exit. > HB>JB> > HB>JB>This is where interrupts are re-enabled, so you are getting an interrupt. > HB>JB>It might be helpful to figure what type of fault you are actually getting. > HB> > HB>tf_err is 0, tf_trapno is 30 (decimal). > > More information: > > I have replaced all the reserved vectors with individual ones, that set > tf_err to the index (vector number). It appears the the vector number is > 39 decimal. What does that mean? IRQ 7. Can you post a verbose dmesg? Also, can you try both with and without ACPI? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/