From owner-cvs-ports  Sat Mar 15 04:25:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA20046
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 04:25:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.15])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA20041;
          Sat, 15 Mar 1997 04:25:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id GAA19599; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 06:24:40 -0600 (CST)
Received: from sjx-ca29-25.ix.netcom.com(204.31.235.153) by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma019588; Sat Mar 15 06:24:29 1997
Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id EAA01615; Sat, 15 Mar 1997 04:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 04:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703151224.EAA01615@baloon.mimi.com>
To: joerg@freefall.freebsd.org
CC: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
        cvs-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199703151036.CAA15313@freefall.freebsd.org> (message from Joerg Wunsch on Sat, 15 Mar 1997 02:36:11 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  ports/sysutils/xperfmon/patches patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad ports/sysutils/xperfmon/scripts configure ports/sysutils/xperfmon Makefile ports/sysutils/xperfmon/files freebsd_system.c ports/sysutils/xperfmon/pkg DESCR PLIST
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 *   1.11      +11 -9     ports/sysutils/xperfmon/Makefile

Joerg, please do not commit submitted Makefiles blindly.  This is a
classic example of why I insist people submit patches for port updates
even if the patch is bigger than the whole thing.

Of those 11 lines of changes, only three (version in the comment,
PKGNAME, and $Id$ line that someone screwed up a long time ago) were
meaningful changes.  The others were spent backing out the cleaning up
we have done in revision 1.9 and 1.10. :(

I'm going to commit the fix now.

By the way, does Lars change the version without touching the distfile
at all?  (The distfile is more than two years old, and we've had three
version-ups since then, without ever touching files/md5!)

Satoshi