From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 10 15:57:46 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4EFD954
 for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CBC131B
 for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868E2649E;
 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:57:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 4B1F2CA1; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:57:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: ar and ranlib -D
References: <86eh15usv2.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <79CBA7AC-998E-46EE-8F94-F92C7C00FF75@bsdimp.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:57:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <79CBA7AC-998E-46EE-8F94-F92C7C00FF75@bsdimp.com> (Warner Losh's
 message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:45:53 -0600")
Message-ID: <86a9btuqh1.fsf@nine.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:57:46 -0000

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
> My only concern is with the %POSIX section. That change isn=E2=80=99t nee=
ded
> for reproducible builds.

Is it harmful?

(what is that, anyway?  It's not documented in make(1))

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no