Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 21:41:54 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>, FreeBSD-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: KERNCONF instead of KERNEL? Message-ID: <20010301214154.A20857@rapier.smartspace.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200103011858.f21IwAL31574@ptavv.es.net>; from oberman@es.net on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:58:10AM -0800 References: <20010301124330.A27288@cec.wustl.edu> <200103011858.f21IwAL31574@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2001-03-01 (10:58), Kevin Oberman wrote: > The old kernel build method: > cd /sys/i386/conf && config KERNEL > cd ../../compile/KERNEL && make depend install > should be used only when you > have made a change to your config file and want to build a new kernel, > especially if the /usr/obj tree is not populated. (Since buildkernel > uses the file in /usr/obj, it will only work if /usr/obj is populated. This is no longer the case - make buildkernel works without a populated obj tree now. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010301214154.A20857>