Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:48:35 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_Tymk=F3w?=" <sebastian.tymkow@gmail.com> To: david_5073@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, Marcello Barreto <marcello@linconet.com.br>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer Message-ID: <692660060811290748i33059137g3977e51f692d8340@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <705757.42117.qm@web38504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20081124180411.0b065be5@wolwerine> <705757.42117.qm@web38504.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
Why do you think it's unrealiable technology ?
I think system that you propose rely on this technology ;)
Most of this use bsd/linux/unix on board with own solutions and than they're
packed into the box
with cute web interface.
Of course I can be wrong...
Best regards,
Shamrock
2008/11/29 David Roseman <david_5073@yahoo.com>
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 11/24/08, Marcello Barreto <marcello@linconet.com.br> wrote:
>
> > From: Marcello Barreto <marcello@linconet.com.br>
> > Subject: PF + ALTQ - Bandwidth per customer
> > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
> > Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 4:04 PM
> > Hello Folks,
> > I believe you have heard this several times, but I'm
> > new to FreeBSD and i'm trying to change my bandwidth
> > control from Linux (iptables + TC + iproute) to Freebsd (PF
> > + ALTQ).
> > I read about PF and I was very interested on it, but I
> > want to limit the bandwidth (Download and Upload) from each
> > customer behind a router (Obviously, FreeBSD with PF.)..
> > There are several networks and a lot of customers, and with
> > my rules, only what I got was each customer sharing the same
> > queue...
> >
> > There are my rules:
> > altq on $external cbq queue {def_up, def_up300, def_up450,
> > def_up600, def_up1000}
> > altq on $internal cbq queue {def_down, def_down300,
> > def_down450, def_down600, def_down1000}
> >
> > queue def_up bandwidth 10% cbq(default)
> > queue def_down bandwidth 10% cbq(default)
> >
> > queue def_up300 bandwidth 128Kb cbq(red)
> > queue def_up450 bandwidth 200Kb cbq(red)
> > queue def_up600 bandwidth 300Kb cbq(red)
> > queue def_up1000 bandwidth 500Kb cbq(red)
> >
> > queue def_down300 bandwidth 300Kb cbq(red)
> > queue def_down450 bandwidth 450Kb cbq(red)
> > queue def_down600 bandwidth 600Kb cbq(red)
> > queue def_down1000 bandwidth 1024Kb cbq(red)
> >
> >
> > pass in quick inet proto {tcp, udp} from <mylocalnet>
> > to any queue def_down300
> > pass out quick inet proto {tcp, udp} from
> > <mylocalnet> to any queue def_up300
> >
>
> You should consider a commercial product rather than relying on
> old and somewhat unreliable technology. We've been able to squeeze a
> lot more customers onto our network for a $3500. investment. It paid for
> itself in 2 months. We have a dual-core 2.33Ghz system passing 95Mb/s
> with 12000 rules in place and it runs at about 10%. The latest version is
> truly amazing.
>
> http://www.etinc.com
>
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?692660060811290748i33059137g3977e51f692d8340>