From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 1 18:36:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8F98FF for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B342066 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id E73436BBC31 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 20:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-14-252.41-151.net24.it [151.41.252.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s61Ia3c8084437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 20:36:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-14-252.41-151.net24.it [151.41.252.14] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s61IZvtW045547; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 20:35:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <53B2FF8D.6030304@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 20:35:57 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Swiger Subject: Re: MTU not regrowing? References: <53A9C6D0.3090900@netfence.it> <2CA56230-440A-4D77-83BD-222FBC704F70@mac.com> <53AACD56.2030701@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <53AACD56.2030701@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Tue, 01 Jul 2014 20:36:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Score: 5.206 (*****) RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:36:16 -0000 On 06/25/14 15:23, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 06/25/14 02:01, Charles Swiger wrote: > >> Does "ifconfig vlan3 down; ifconfig vlan3 up" do any good? >> Or that run against the physical NIC? None of the two. John was right about the route. bye & Thanks av.