Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:48:20 -0500 From: hg@cally.queue.to To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is a good choice of sata-ii raid controller for freebsd? Message-ID: <20070211194820.36691.qmail@cally.queue.to> In-Reply-To: <20070211140444.GB40782@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <00ad01c74b65$79db1710$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070208094620.GA9599@rink.nu> <00a701c74b6e$7c3e4550$fe03a8c0@claylaptop> <20070208165224.GA35610@icarus.home.lan> <45CC72D4.9040104@lxnt.info> <01e601c74c5d$31be19c0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070211140444.GB40782@hugo10.ka.punkt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In mpc.lists.freebsd.stable, you wrote: : For modern CPUs this extra work is measurably neglegible. With all of the interrupt activity it seems counterintuitive that it would be negligible in that the processor is incurring many extra cache faults to service the controller.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070211194820.36691.qmail>