Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:17:49 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: "David A. Panariti" <davep@who.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20010622211749.D1493@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <15155.3827.672353.34621@guru.mired.org>; from mwm@mired.org on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:25:07AM -0500 References: <20010622012040E.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <006c01c0fac8$b55f0380$94cba8c0@xena> <200106220409.f5M49b429872@baloo.ne.mediaone.net> <15155.3827.672353.34621@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:25:07, mwm (Mike Meyer) wrote about "Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD": > What is your magic tag going to be tracking on January 1st? 5.0 or > 4.5? Do we need three versions of your new tag for this: one for > SUPER_STABLE (tracks to 4.6 before jumping to 5.2), one for > GENERAL_STABLE (jumps from 4.5 to 5.1) and one for RELEASE_STABLE > (from 4.4 to 5.0)? Moreover, I know a man which says that the last Really Stable release was 1.1.5.1. Of course he uses 4.* and 3.* now, but they are unstable for him. /netch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010622211749.D1493>