From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 26 21:31:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mailgw1.prontomail.com (mailgw1.prontomail.com [209.185.149.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6606237B819 for ; Fri, 26 May 2000 21:31:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tkato@prontomail.ne.jp) Received: from mail46.prontomail.com (209.185.149.146) by mailgw1.prontomail.com (NPlex 4.5.049) id 39180973001EE9C1 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 May 2000 21:31:51 -0700 Received: from web14 (209.185.149.214) by mail46.prontomail.com (NPlex 2.0.123); Fri, 26 May 2000 21:30:35 -0700 From: "KATO Tsuguru" Message-Id: <01C9EA0D17234D11783400807C33DA2C@tkato.prontomail.ne.jp> Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 13:31:43 +0900 X-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki Subject: Re: PNG support of netpbm-9.2 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, knu@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Web Based Pronto Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Is there any technical/political issue not to support PNG out there? It's simple. graphics/pnmtopng is in Ports Collection. I noticed that prepareing identical program in netpbm package is obviously waste of disk space, although it's sure that this hasn't became fatal problem due to different PREFIX at present. In addition, since there is actually no reason for graphics/pnmtopng to leave PREFIX difinition as USE_X_PREFIX any more, It would be recomended to change it. -- KATO Tsuguru / tkato@prontomail.ne.jp Sent by Japanese ProntoMail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message