Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:11:01 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found Message-ID: <20060315090615.I56469@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <20060314.204252.74651890.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20060315004530.B5861@fledge.watson.org> <20060314.204252.74651890.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Warner Losh wrote: WL>> The main motivator for pruning has to do with the SMP network stack work: WL>> we're reaching the point, discussed on a number of occasions previously on WL>> this mailing list, where jettisoning unmaintained network stack components WL>> that are unable to run MPSAFE, is highly desirable. WL> WL>What's the timeline for non-MPSAFE network drivers to be taken out WL>behind the woodshed? Right now the list appears to be: WL> WL> an, awi, cm, cnw, cs, en, ex, fatm, ie, lnc, patm, fea, fpa, WL> mn, ray, sbni, sbsh, snc, tx, wl, xe, ar, sr, plip Both patm and fatm are MPSAFE - I forgot, maybe, to set the INTR_MPSAFE flag. I'll fix that. harti
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060315090615.I56469>