Date: 19 Feb 2003 17:35:11 -0800 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/files patch-do_text.c patch-programs-Imakefile patch-x11perf-Imakefile patch-xditview-Imakefile patch-xterm-Imakefile ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients Makefile pkg-plist ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/files manpages Message-ID: <1045703645.723.46.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <20030220003737.93031.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <200302190806.h1J86s9x073775@repoman.freebsd.org> <1045642448.705.78.camel@leguin> <20030219093128.GA31959@tara.freenix.org> <1045697895.723.38.camel@leguin> <20030220003737.93031.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 16:37, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:37:53PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 01:31, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > According to Eric Anholt: > > > > reported about -clients and it built fine on my machine, but because of > > > > changes I had made to imake for the XFree86 4.2.99.* ports it didn't > > > > build with Xft support. > > > > > > I'd suggest a PORTREVISION bump. > > > > The functionality of the port didn't change, so according to my > > understanding PORTREVISION doesn't get bumped. (I may have been > > confusing: It was only on my local machine that things it built without > > Xft) > > Did the port build before? If yes, then lots of ppl have the port > installed. Do they need to have this updated version instead of > this old one? Unless there is a PORTREVISION bump, ppl who were able > to install the previous unpatched version won't know to upgrade. > If the port did not build before, then it's not a problem. The only difference between now and when the port last built is that it uses libXft.so.2 instead of libXft.so.1 and lacks one error-checking block that no longer applied for libXft.so.2. To me, this is like shared library version chasing that happens for other ports where we don't bump PORTREVISION either, if I remember right. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1045703645.723.46.camel>