From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 16:17:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF5716A468 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:17:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-107.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-107.bluehost.com [69.89.22.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEAC213C447 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 26322 invoked by uid 0); 19 Feb 2008 16:16:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by xmail.bluehost.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2008 16:16:59 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JRV9P-0005V9-Bl; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:16:59 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:16:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:16:57 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20080219161657.GC91805@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing List , Tim Daneliuk , Gary Kline References: <20080219142047.GB27411@dell1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080219142047.GB27411@dell1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Cc: Tim Daneliuk , Gary Kline Subject: Re: thankee, thankee! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:17:00 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:20:47AM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Tim Daneliuk : > > > > Before you go down this road too far, you should take a look at Python > > as an implementation language. If what you're doing involves text and > > string manipulation, Python is loaded with good modules that will make > > your task a snap. Having coded extensively in many assemblers, C, > > BASIC, ... I now find myself reaching exclusively for Python when > > writing applications and utilities unless the task at hand must have > > the performance of native C. Try it ... you'll be shocked how fast > > your program comes together. > > Might the same not be said for Perl? Yes . . . and Ruby. I prefer both over Python, for different reasons, personally. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Rudy Giuliani: "You have free speech so I can be heard."