Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:42:30 +0200 From: beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com To: "Glen Barber" <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 Now Available Message-ID: <ebef3a6c539a7be6d6a953b1a0278049.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion> In-Reply-To: <20140929031120.GI75063@hub.FreeBSD.org> References: <20140928155118.GA75063@hub.FreeBSD.org> <fe17030e3efeefb5dfa800b46ee181d9.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion> <20140929025102.GH75063@hub.FreeBSD.org> <20140929031120.GI75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, September 29, 2014 5:11 am, "Glen Barber" <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:51:02PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:45:21AM +0200, beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com >> wrote: >> > Why 10.1-BETA3 announcement signed with not usual PGP key? >> > >> >> Because it is a BETA build, and not a release. >> > > After re-reading your reply, I realize I haven't sent my last set of PGP > subkeys. Thanks gjb@! I will watch for those, so I can verify BETA3 and later before testing/using. (But sad nobody before noticed and asked you. I thought I am very slow.) > Anyway, this is not RE-related. Jah, 'RE-related' would be public verify method for whole svn repo tied to audit trail of release process. :-( Anyway... thanks again for clarify the mysterious keyid 0x478FE293. (fyi I checked keyservers too before I mail the list.)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ebef3a6c539a7be6d6a953b1a0278049.squirrel>