Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:24:25 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9 Message-ID: <40994934@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080315135046.50957aqphwntgv40@intranet.encontacto.net> (eculp@encontacto.net's message of "Sat\, 15 Mar 2008 13\:50\:46 -0500") References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <62449124@ipt.ru> <20080315135046.50957aqphwntgv40@intranet.encontacto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:50:46 -0500 eculp wrote: > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>: > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:04:24 -0500 eculp wrote: > > > >> Since the skype port has some upgrade issues I decided to build > >> skype-devel on AMD64 Current and know that a 2.6 kernel is needed. > >> What would be the recommended, leading edge linux emulator and kernel > >> version. This is my laptop and isn't really mission critical so I can > >> give myself the luxury of doing some experimenting. If I'm lucky one > >> of these days the linux flash9 plugin may even work. > > > > I suppose it's linux_base-f7 for now. Please, read > > /usr/ports/UPDAING. > I had already set the kernel to 2.4.20 and though that there might be > an advantage to go to f7 and a 2.6.?? kernel. UPDATING doesn't give > me that info. If there is major advantage, like flash9, the new skype > with video, etc. I will think about it it bit more. Can't say anything about 2.4.20. Only 2.4.2 (the default one) and 2.6.16 (with is intended to become a default in the future) are tested. Use any other values at your risk. WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40994934>