Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:36:43 +0100 From: Paul Richards <paul@freebsd-services.com> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock Message-ID: <20030417163642.GI23466@survey.codeburst.net> In-Reply-To: <20030414211310.I5215@hub.org> References: <20030414192627.C32D543F3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20030414170306.C70262@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <20030414211310.I5215@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 09:13:54PM +0000, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > > Pawel, > > > > Last I've heard, SCHED_ULE isn't SMP friendly. I've got big problems with current now. I haven't been able to build a SCHED_ULE working kernel since 11 April. It has dies with the blockable sleep lock as per this thread and I've been trying a new kernel each day but it's still broken. I tried to track down the commit and I know it exists in a kernel built later than 12th but I haven't pinpointed the exact commit yet. To make things worse though, I tried to build a SCHED_4BSD kernel to see if it was ULE specific and I'm seeing different problems with that kernel. In X keypresses are getting duplicated i.e. I press a key and it appears multiple times. If I come back to a tty then after a while it all just locks up solid. For me at least current is very sick at the moment. Paul.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030417163642.GI23466>