From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 3 9:50:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (ip-198-202.guate.net [209.198.197.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E871414E16 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 09:49:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obonilla@voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu) Received: (from obonilla@localhost) by voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA34960; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:46:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from obonilla) Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 10:46:05 -0600 From: Oscar Bonilla To: Chris Costello Cc: Oscar Bonilla , "Brian W. Buchanan" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UCB removes advertising clause Message-ID: <19990903104605.H34503@fisicc-ufm.edu> References: <19990903093103.D34503@fisicc-ufm.edu> <19990903113224.I30496@holly.calldei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <19990903113224.I30496@holly.calldei.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 11:32:24AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote: > > does that mean we can get rid of the copyright of the University at > > boot time? do we want to? > > If it were up to me, we would not want to. I feel we should > continue to give UCB credit regardless of whether that particular > clause in the license agreement is enforced. Without them, where > would we be? > I totally agree here. Besides it shows a certaing linage to be a direct descendant of Berkeley Unix :) -Oscar -- For PGP Public Key: finger obonilla@fisicc-ufm.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message