Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 15:11:12 -0600 From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug Message-ID: <4CED8DBC-2CDD-4AEC-ABA9-A8B865F5CB1D@goldmark.org> In-Reply-To: <4B40F9AB.8030409@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <EB178F24-BF6F-4645-AB0F-5A15A2F51736@goldmark.org> <20100101231924.4df469df@gumby.homeunix.com> <35F4927C-D6EA-4C27-B9ED-3E07FFA5FD28@goldmark.org> <4B3F46ED.7080100@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20100102144557.5ad217f7@gumby.homeunix.com> <5B9046E5-B39C-434A-9B8E-8C105869C327@goldmark.org> <4B406B21.5000800@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4B40F9AB.8030409@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > There's a .shar of the new port at: >=20 > http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar >=20 > Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, = I'll > send-pr(1) in a week or so. Thanks for doing that. It looks great to me. I just wonder about it = being enabled by default. I don't know what official policy is (if such = a thing exists), but my experience with FreeBSD ports is that while they = install things, the user must still explicitly enable them. So if might be a good idea to set the defaults to "NO" and include a = pkg-message that instructs people to add the enabling lines in = /etc/periodic.conf.local I'm also wondering about the name of the port. This really is only one = utility. Anyway, those are trivial concerns. The substance of your port all = looks very good to me. Cheers, -j --=20 Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CED8DBC-2CDD-4AEC-ABA9-A8B865F5CB1D>