From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 15 21:37:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2E916A41F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:37:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca
	[128.100.216.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B597C43D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:37:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11])
	by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with
	ESMTP id j8FLbK0r026199
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:37:20 -0400
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP
	id j8FLbJ6P027696; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:37:20 -0400
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3509F51237; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:37:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:37:19 -0400
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
Message-ID: <20050915213719.GA26998@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20050914194612.15692485.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<43286E37.40203@samsco.org>
	<20050914222013.178dc4dc.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<84dead72050914135239514c49@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050915000053.448f251b.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<84dead7205091500152a7c25d1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050915172005.072f4bdf.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
	<20050915181238.54b16b4b.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050915181238.54b16b4b.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: low(er) disk performance with sched_4bsd then with sched_ule
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:37:23 -0000


--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:12:38PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Oliver Lehmann wrote:
>=20
> > Joseph Koshy wrote:
> >=20
> > > What happens if you use a kernel with 'options NO_ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES' ?
> >=20
> > I'll try this and respond back
> >=20
>=20
> Hmm, that made it more worse

What about using schedgraph as I suggested previously?

Kris

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDKemOWry0BWjoQKURAj6RAJ4s2aleNhLs/wFJG4F7++eAwl5JVwCg9pRx
zN6lbW/tiaKrHZVIq6bHAQ0=
=jaVB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw--