Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Dec 2000 01:46:56 -0500
From:      "Donald J . Maddox" <dmaddox@sc.rr.com>
To:        Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>
Cc:        dmaddox@sc.rr.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken?
Message-ID:  <20001218014656.A17483@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <200012180641.eBI6fH607564@dungeon.home>; from mckay@thehub.com.au on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:41:17PM %2B1000
References:  <20001216161756.A6370@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200012171658.eBHGwGW24109@dungeon.home> <20001217135431.C9721@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200012180641.eBI6fH607564@dungeon.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, if you do manage to uncover the lost magic, please let me
know :)

On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:41:17PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> 
> I expected some build tool expert to say "Just compile with these
> options".  But they haven't.  So I'll see if the bits have rotted,
> or whether we can keep building ld.so instead of just including
> an age old binary.
> 
> Stephen.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001218014656.A17483>