From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 20:40:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C4F16A4CE for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:40:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C582A43D55 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.171.1.225 with login) by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2004 20:40:15 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:40:14 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200411211341.10072.dantavious@comcast.net> <200412171959.26989.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200412171222.02560.jtinnin@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200412171222.02560.jtinnin@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412171240.15032.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: "Alexander@Leidinger.net" cc: Derrick Edwards Subject: Re: SKYPE Sound Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:40:16 -0000 Sorry, sent this from the wrong email account before; re-sending ... On Friday 17 December 2004 10:59 am, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 17. December 2004 19:45, I wrote: > > With that modification, run artsdsp esd and test some app that uses > > esound (like xmms with the esound output plugin enabled). fstat > > /dev/dsp* should only show artsdsp. > > N.B.: artsdsp esd -nobeeps -as 1 is probably better for real-world > usage, since this makes the wrapped esd release the device after 1 > second of idle time, allowing artsd to to the same (if configured > that way). Oh yeah and -nobeeps is probably self-explaining 8-). Actually, I find that sysctl works fine with virtual channels. Is there any advantage one way or another? Seems to me like virtual channels is a bit more ... elegant, but I'm not sure if it would matter. Thanks for the patch either way, as it might come in handy, and it's always good to learn about more than one way to solve a problem. - jt