Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:56:24 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS dependencies and ports fallback Message-ID: <53B3E558.90607@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <53B3D3BE.5040007@omnilan.de> References: <53B3D3BE.5040007@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 02.07.2014 11:41 (localtime): > Hello, > > please set me CC, I'm not subscribed, thanks. > > I set USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS together with PKGNG(=devel) on 9.2. … > Since I'm doing a port build, I expect that devel/oniguruma4 will be > built, as long as USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY is _not_ set (which reflects > my state). > It seems to work so for 'first-level-dependencies', but seems to fail > for dependencies of a dependency (my very first guess, haven't falsified > yet). Done so. It's true that as soon as USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS is set, only the first dependency will be checked if it's going to be installed as package or build has to run. In bsd.port.mk: _INSTALL_DEPENDS= if [ -n "${USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS}" -o -n "${USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY}" ]; then \ … if [ -r "$${subpkgfile}" -a "$$target" = "${DEPENDS_TARGET}" ]; then \ … if [ -n "${WITH_PKGNG}" -a $${subpkgname} = "pkg" ]; then \ … else \ if [ -n "${WITH_PKGNG}" ]; then \ _pkg_add_a="-A"; \ fi; \ ${PKG_ADD} $${_pkg_add_a} $${subpkgfile}; \ Now to solve this, I guess it was needed to do binary-depends-resolving at this place, right? Or is there a easier way (altering DEPENDS_TARGET eg., sorry, don't know bsd.port.mk well, so starting from scratch…) Is this issue hitting anybody else? Thanks, -Harry P.S.: please set me CC, I'm not subscribed, thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53B3E558.90607>