Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:03:21 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFS (read-only) support committed to CURRENT Message-ID: <43A533E9.8010901@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051216151228.GA34670@crodrigues.org> References: <20051213151908.GA26821@crodrigues.org> <m37ja59ttm.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20051216151228.GA34670@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Craig Rodrigues wrote: >On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:15:17PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > > >>Hm. Does this mean that FreeBSD's XFS implementation is GPL'd like >>ext2fs is? If so, allow me a question why XFS was chosen in preference >>to ext3fs? >> >> > >Your comment makes no sense. What does being GPL have to do with >choosing ext2fs vs. XFS? We ported XFS to FreeBSD because we felt like it, >and it was fun. ext3fs is irrelevant. > > > I would like to see writable XFS, this gives us another FS option, how diffcult would it be? :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43A533E9.8010901>