Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911181228060.12162@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <367b2c980911180330x32407537qa6468d230936cb85@mail.gmail.com> References: <200911172043.28008.gnemmi@gmail.com> <20091118000838.60CBC1CC47@ptavv.es.net> <19e9a5dc0911171905r67f4e9c4q8513782cce8f5f82@mail.gmail.com> <367b2c980911180330x32407537qa6468d230936cb85@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Olivier Smedts wrote: > But someone (you, me...) can file a PR to add them to OLD_FILES when > WITHOUT_TELNET is set to yes, like it's done for some other WITHOUT_ > options. If it's done for other WITHOUT_ options, it's not obvious to me. I thought that, to date, OLD_FILES was used solely for files no longer built at all that were at one time previously built, not for conditional building. I'm not aware of any support in the source tree for scrubbing conditionally built files from the target tree that aren't installable with the current build options. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0911181228060.12162>