Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:27:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Charlie Watts <cewatts@frontier.net> To: Paul <tribble@tribble.net> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Benchmarks from SysAdmin mag Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107121519200.10984-100000@animas.frontier.net> In-Reply-To: <20010712145154.B58265@tribble.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Paul wrote: > Hi all... it appears that after so many FreeBSD users (including > myself) sent sysadmin magazine messages regarding the benchmark article > previously discussed in this thread, they've posted a follow-up. They > sent me an email directly in respond to my message, giving me the new URL. > > So, everyone interested check out: > http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0108/0108q/0108q.htm They claim to have both done: tunefs -n enable / tunefs -n enable /usr tunefs -n enable /var And: in /etc/fstab Add to options for all hard disk file systems ",async": Given this, which takes precedence? Or am I mis-understanding? I think of the three options as sync, async, and softupdates. If you turn async AND softupdates on, what is really happening? -- Charlie Watts cewatts@frontier.net Frontier Internet Systems Janitor and Network Plumber http://www.frontier.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0107121519200.10984-100000>