From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 3 19:53:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE7416A4CF; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:53:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6981A43D55; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:53:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 2E25C5C86B; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:53:47 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20040703195347.GF95729@elvis.mu.org> References: <20040702184020.GC95729@elvis.mu.org> <40E70D90.4090304@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E70D90.4090304@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tweaking mounted filesystems by fsid X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 19:53:47 -0000 * Scott Long [040703 12:50] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > >Use nmount or sysctl? > > > > Can't comment on your main questions, but there has been talk about > removing nmount since the work was never finished and the benefits > never realized. If you'd like to breath some life into it, feel free. I'll look at it, nmount is cool, it shouldn't die. I may just use sysctl because it's what I have experience with... we'll see. -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684