From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Feb 19 20:10:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E26B37B41A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1K47mI95660; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:07:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:07:48 -0500 From: Alan Eldridge To: erik@smluc.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/32491: XF86 4.1.0 DPMS not functioning Message-ID: <20020220040748.GA95647@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20020220040226.20297.qmail@www.smluc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020220040226.20297.qmail@www.smluc.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:02:26AM -0000, erik@smluc.org wrote: >> Synopsis: XF86 4.1.0 DPMS not functioning >> >> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> State-Changed-By: petef >> State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 19 18:56:21 PST 2002 >> State-Changed-Why: >> Requested by submitter -- 4.2.0 will probably fix this. >> >> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=32491 >> > >this was a non-bug I think, I have DPMS working fine with X 4.1.0, >and had it working with 4.2.0 before the downgrade, it just requires >this line added to the active monitor > >Option "DPMS" > >Does this belong in the handbook maybe? > > -Erik [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik] Uh, that would be, "yes". That's all there is to it? Well, /sbin/fsck --harder /dev/me. -- Alan Eldridge "Dave's not here, man." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message