Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, Wayne Cuddy <wayne@crb-web.com>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: what is devfs?
Message-ID:  <199909200513.WAA77228@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909191854230.4696-100000@picnic.mat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:you're on, but there are 2 sides to the argument.  Isn't there some way
:that it can be set up to *optionally* have permission persistence?
:
:If you would get past that point, then all the political problems that
:remain are solvable.
:
:Whatever, let's please not get into an argument over persistence, it's in
:the archives.
:
:----------------------------------------------------------------------------
:Chuck Robey                | Interests include C programming, Electronics,

   Personally speaking I don't see how permission persistence could possibly
   be implemented within DEVFS itself without a huge amount of work.  I'm
   not sure it would be appropriate to implement it there anyhow when it
   is so easy to just make the necessary changes in rc.local.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909200513.WAA77228>