From owner-cvs-share  Sat Apr 11 21:59:45 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-share>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA16447
          for cvs-share-outgoing; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 21:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-share)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA16438;
          Sat, 11 Apr 1998 21:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA27004;
	Sat, 11 Apr 1998 21:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-share@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/doc/smm Makefile 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Apr 1998 21:44:34 EDT."
             <199804120144.VAA20587@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 21:59:43 -0700
Message-ID: <27000.892357183@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-share@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

But they also get built from that directory; what's the harm?
Otherwise, why don't we just KILL the stupid 07.lpd directory?

> <<On Sat, 11 Apr 1998 08:10:36 -0700 (PDT), "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.
ORG> said:
> 
> >   Modified files:
> >     share/doc/smm        Makefile 
> >   Log:
> >   MF22: build lpd docs
>   
> No.  The lpd docs are built from lpd.
> 
> -GAWollman
> 
> --
> Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the sa
me
> wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
> Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
> MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick