Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:23:31 -0300 From: Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> To: sthaug@nethelp.no, jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Intel X520-SR2 stopping Message-ID: <53B45C33.1010501@bsdinfo.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20140702.190739.74686622.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <CAFOYbcni9NT4eVS53-EB4yP4NO2wbhd9FCTmB=QaqPVjZsNjwQ@mail.gmail.com> <53B3F1B6.9010606@bsdinfo.com.br> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65687E8F859E@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <20140702.190739.74686622.sthaug@nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 02/07/2014 14:07, sthaug@nethelp.no escreveu: >> Is there any way that you can try a reproduce this using a B2B configuration, or something that doesn't use XFP as a link partner? I'm thinking that you are correct regarding an incompatibility issue between SFP+ and XFP. > Why do you believe that? The optical signals are the same for SFP+ > and XFP. > > We have lots of 10G SFP+ / XFP links in production. It just works... > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no > I think I found the problem. Our SFP+ optical module is 850nm MMF and our transport operator is using an XFP 1310nmMMF. I am waiting for them to exchange the module and see the result. Once the module is changed, I post here. Thanks and best regards, Gondim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53B45C33.1010501>