Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 18:37:26 -0500 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: John Kelly <jak@cetlink.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) Message-ID: <34B957B6.AEC4CDAF@scsn.net> References: <19980111150619.48677@scsn.net> <34b95e60.140553@mail.cetlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Kelly wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:06:19 -0500, dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J.
> Maddox) wrote:
>
> > I recently bought a 16C650-based LavaPort ISA card to support the
> >230,400 bps capability of my ISDN modem. It works fine under W95, but
> >does _not_ work fine under FBSD-current.
>
> The 650 support seems to be broken, so don't flag it as a 650. Run it
> as a 550 and it should work fine. You still get the benefit of the
> deeper FIFO, even when it's defined as a 550. You don't get the auto
> CTS/RTS flow control, but that has questionable value anyway.
>
> John
Hmmm... I originally configured it as a basic 16550, since
sio apparently doesn't have any support for >115.2Kbps anyway, but
even then it looked like the baud rate just couldn't be changed
from 9600. I suppose it's possible that the LavaPort's interface
is non-standard(?) Anybody have any experience with this card?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34B957B6.AEC4CDAF>